Getting The Best Out Of SSO And MFA
Combining
a user ID and password to protect our most sensitive information is not good
enough anymore. Identity theft, breaches of data, ransomware, and malicious
actors mean that information security must change in order to stay ahead of
security threats. Effective safety is compulsory for all organizations. The
best security strategy must take into account the demands of the organization
and the staff, balancing security, encryption, and ease-of-use.
There
are two key security solutions for many businesses, Single Sign-On (SSO) or
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), to choose from. To decide what's best for
the organization, it takes careful consideration of the pros and cons of each
approach. There is no reciprocal exclusion between the two mechanisms; both can
be leveraged. However, knowing how to devote time and budget to one project
over another can make all the difference.
Multi-Factor
Authentication (MFA)
MFA
uses many distinct factors to verify user identity and grant access to
different applications, programs, and data. To authenticate people, MFA systems
typically use two or three of the following factors:
What
you know: A personal identifying number, a password, or questions
about recovery.
What
you have: A smart card, a one-time (OTP) password, a Bluetooth
device, or some other authenticator.
Who
you are: A biometric authenticator, like the identification of a
fingerprint or face.
Where
you're and what you're doing: GPS, IP or Integrated Windows
Authentication (IWA) address, location-based authentication, and how you type
in (keystroke biometrics).
The
benefit of multi-factor authentication is that, in most cases, it is very
secure. By combining a password, physical token, and biometrics, the risk of
data and software breaches can be significantly reduced.
However,
it also has the reputation of being a little difficult to manage if MFA has any
advantages in securing user logins. Users need to be provided with the second
element. Still, for most enterprises, the MFA safeguards against unauthorized
entry.
Single
Sign-On (SSO)
The
principle behind Single Sign-On is very straightforward; users make a master
sign-on to authenticate themselves at the start of their workday. Then, if they
need to log into another application, the SSO solution logs in on their behalf.
The SSO solution internally stores the various passwords for any program users
need to access and then validates the users of those systems when they need to
be accessed.
Single
Sign-On: Benefits
Users
only have to remember one password. While they may often be required to provide
credentials for other systems, substantially less effort is needed.
Extra
security, such as biometric authentication, may be applied or accessed to the
initial Single Sign-On via a soft token, USB token, or similar encryption
method. The MFA comes into action here.
SSO is
fast and easy for the end-user. It saves time by not forcing them to spend time
logging into many different systems.
Access
risks are reduced in some situations. For example, for third-party
applications, credentials may be stored internally. There is no need for
external systems.
It
results in fewer calls to the service desk for password resets, reducing
resource demands for IT support.
Disadvantages
Of Single Sign-On
If a
hacker, malicious agent, or malware obtains SSO access, all systems used by SSO
are compromised. SSO must be introduced with strong encryption and
authentication mechanisms to prevent this from occurring.
The
lack of functionality of SSO systems implies that a user cannot access other systems,
being a single point of failure.
SSO
and MFA: The Dual Advantage
The
issue of security and authentication in various areas is addressed by both the
MFA and SSO.
For
customers, SSO is more convenient, but it has greater inherent security risks.
The MFA is better, but it's less convenient. What are the two areas that can be
combined to provide a solution that is both simple and secure?
The
encryption and authentication industry is going that way. Many of the new
solutions being tested and used include the following:
At the
start of the day, it needs stable MFA sign-on, similar to an SSO solution.
Granting
continued access to authenticated users throughout their workday.
Requiring
further verification using MFA on the basis of applicable criteria, including:
· Access
to the most vulnerable devices.
· Changes
in user behavior observed by software.
· Using
criteria such as location, position, seniority, and the like, to determine when
new authentication is needed.
·
Using algorithms in particular use cases to
smartly request additional credentials.
The
simplicity of SSO, combined with MFA defense, provides businesses with a
security posture and confidence. In addition, supplying customers with the
efficiency and comfort offered by MFA and SSO means fewer password resets and
calls to the help desk.
Comments
Post a Comment